Chronology part 6

Chronology explanations on the novel The Sign of Four, also known as The Sign of the Four

• SIGN - September 7, 1887

There are two schools of thought on Mary Morstan's case. There are people who set the story in 1888, though they may disagree on the month, and there are those who set the story in 1887. A chronologist has to be careful of this decision, because Watson will get married afterward and move out of Baker Street. Then in the short stories, he'll date many cases to "before my marriage" and "after my marriage," making this choice crucial to placing all the other cases in order.

Chronology part 5

Moving on to dating other Holmes stories:

• REIG - April 1887. The Lyons telegram is the 14th, but the Reigate case starts on the 25th.
• SILV - July 7-12, 1887

REIG has had multiple titles over the years: "Reigate Squire", "Reigate Squires", and "Reigate Puzzle." It depends on what collection or edition you have, what the title will be. This case has one of the more interesting beginnings, because Watson mentions a great international case, concerning the Netherland-Sumatra Company and the colossal schemes of Baron Maupertuis, which Holmes investigated in France. He was apparently there for two months, working 15 hour days, for four days at a stretch. Yet Watson was not with him, and we are given no explanation for why. It could be that Watson got a medical job and couldn't go to France for that long. (I'm thinking of locum work, filling in for other doctors, rather than a practice of his own.) Brad Keefauver thinks that Watson was romancing a new wife and that Holmes wanted to get away starting in February. But I don't subscribe to theories about Watson constantly getting married, let alone the idea that they were all fake marriages. It could be that Holmes asked Watson not to come, that he secretly planned to use cocaine to sustain that crazy pace, and he knew that Watson would object to the drug.

Chronology part 4

Chronology explanations on the novel The Valley of Fear

• VALL - January 7, 1887

Now this one is definitely complex. This novel has a well known conflict with "The Final Problem" in that Watson knows all about Moriarty in VALL, but in FINA, set a few years later, he's never heard of Moriarty. Holmes also talks about the professor so much to Scotland Yard that they think he has a bee in his bonnet about Moriarty. The novel also has a chronology problem in its American flashback featuring a Pinkerton investigating the Scowrers 20 years ago, which is not enough time for him to lose his first wife Ettie Shafter, get rich with Cecil Barker in California, and be chased by criminals out of America to England. It's really a shame that Conan Doyle keeps using this long flashback format, because he almost never gets the time periods to mesh well with the main text. Oh, also Doyle based the Vermissa Valley story on the real life Pinkerton John McParland investigating the Molly Maguires in Pennsylvania; it's an example of their union-busting deeds, and Doyle doesn't see the Pinkertons as villains at all. He thinks of them as clever, brave detectives righteously taking down an evil criminal gang, as if the Mollies were equivalent to the KKK. He even features another heroic Pinkerton in "The Red Circle" story.

Infatuation

Expanding from Watson's letter to Doyle, here's what happened later in April 1883, after the Speckled Band case. Apologies if I haven't caught all the present tense and changed it to past tense.

Fandom: Sherlock Holmes

Story: Deeper in Memory, partial chapter 16

Pairing: Holmes/Watson, Holmes/Helen Stoner

Warnings: unresolved sexual tension, G

Watson's letter to Doyle

As a break from the boring chronology posts, here's another bit from my DIM novel. Recall that there's a love triangle going on between Holmes, Watson, and Helen Stoner in the 1880s, during their bachelor days. However, Holmes has rejected Helen Stoner since Chapter 21, when he visited her in New York and briefly met Irene Adler in 1884.

Since 1886, Watson has become friends with a fellow doctor, who is also an author. In fact Conan Doyle helped write the Mormon part of A Study in Scarlet, and got the novel sold to a publisher, though they lost the copyright in the deal. The publisher is holding the novel for a year due to the glut of "cheap fiction", and will publish it in December 1887. Meanwhile, the two writers correspond and discuss which other case they should make into a novel next, because then they can keep the royalties and maybe make money. So Watson has written up "sample stories" of some cases such as the Copper Beeches to show to Doyle. As they discuss Holmes in their letters, Doyle asks a question about Holmes's drug use, and this is Watson's response. Notice that he carefully lies and suppresses the full truth about his "strange brief affair" with Holmes in 1887.

Chronology part 3

Some more reasoning on my Sherlock Holmes chronology.

• SPEC - April 1883
• COPP - early spring 1884
• BERY - Friday in February 1885
• YELL - Saturday in early spring 1886

"The Speckled Band" has long been undisputed by chronologists. Watson says it occurred in early April 1883, and there's nothing to contradict it. It was published in the Strand in February 1892, and Watson opens by discussing "my notes of the seventy odd cases in which I have during the last eight years studied the methods of my friend Sherlock Holmes." Chronologists all pounce on a similar opening in "Veiled Lodger" to calculate the length of Holmes's career, yet they forget that SPEC has this reference to the past 8 years. 1892 minus 8 years only gets back to 1884. Is there something else he's not counting? 1881 plus 8 years gets us to 1889. Oh, I see. He's not counting some months in early 1881 when he didn't go with Holmes on cases, he's not counting some months in early 1887 when Holmes is away in France solving a big case without him (REIG), and he's not counting some months just after his marriage (before SCAN) when he was busy with his new practice and not visiting Holmes. So assuming those months add up to a year, we can get to from 1881 to 1890. Per "The Final Problem," Watson barely saw Holmes for 3 cases in 1890, and then didn't see Holmes early the next year. Watson only saw Holmes because of Moriarty's threat from April to May 1891 and that wasn't a case so much as an escape to continental Europe. That's why he's not counting that year. So those are the years that he considers himself Holmes's biographer. Keep that in mind for when he recalculates for us in VEIL later. Odd how it's always the early months in the year that he misses recording cases.