Now in 2020, the Estate is trying to sue Netflix about a new Enola Holmes movie. This movie is based on a book series by Nancy Springer about Sherlock's younger sister Enola, but the Estate is only just now suing because it sees there's money in this. Also, they've changed tactics due to their previous defeat in court. The Estate used to argue that Sherlock evolved over time throughout all 60 stories, so because 10 of the original stories were still in copyright, the character as a whole should remain in copyright. This was rubbish because Conan Doyle was never that consistent in writing Sherlock. (The 10 cases are the Casebook of Sherlock Holmes, published after 1923. That's the cutoff year for copyright in the United States.)
In Klinger's lawsuit the judge ruled that while Holmes is public domain, the Casebook stories are still in copyright. So any characteristic of Holmes found exclusively in this Casebook is not in public domain yet. That's what the Conan Doyle Estate is arguing now, claiming that Netflix's movie and Springer's books feature traits of Sherlock that are only found in the Casebook stories. It's flimsy, but they hope this will work based on the prior precedent. They're so greedy, trying to get as much money as they can before all the stories fall out of copyright in 2023.
Meanwhile, movie releases are getting shifted again, with Mulan going to August now. It's so frustrating because it did have a movie premiere in March just before theatres shut down, but most of the country hasn't seen it yet. We'll have to wait some more I guess.
No comments:
Post a Comment